Digital Media and User Generated Content debate

The statement that was put forward for this debate was “Digital media and user generated content has changed the production and consumption of media”.

For this debate the class was split into three separate groups, one group that argued in agreement of the statement, one group that argued against the statement, and one group that had the opportunity to question the two other groups on their statement. I was placed in the group arguing against the statement.

In my research in order to argue my point I discovered that although the amount of content being produced has increased the quality of it has decreased due to everyone being able to create what they want and there being no one to make sure the quality of content is of a certain standard. This strengthens one of the arguments made by the side against that Gatekeepers are still needed to check the quality of the content.

Another piece of information that I found during my research was that user generated content is becoming more like the old content made with old media as they all use advertisements to try and make money and the content that they make is made to make money.

The group that was arguing for the statement opened up their argument by saying that newspaper sales have been declining gradually over the last 10 years, in comparison to Twitter which in the last 5 years has gained around 300 million active accounts, and the group had the statistics to back this up. They also claimed that Twitter offers more unbiased viewpoints than newspapers because of the Gatekeepers that control the newspapers. They finished their opening argument by saying that the internet has become a much safer platform for viewing the news and other things that were formally viewed in old mediums.

The group against this statement started by saying that the old media is still around, such as newspapers and radios and the old Gatekeepers such as BBC are still the largest providers of content. They also argued that modern editing techniques on software such as Photoshop are techniques that were used before for editing in places like Dark Rooms, so the only thing that has changed is the platforms used for editing. Finally they argued that we still take in information in the same way suggesting that consumption hasn’t changed and that even in all the new ways of getting information bias still exists as its just peoples opinions instead of companies opinions.

After this the side arguing for had a chance to counter and they said that the BBC uses new media t get its information and even has a whole section dedicated to searching social media for news. They also said that digital media and user generated content has introduced the “many to many” communication option whereas before it was “one to one” or “one to many”.

Then the against side had a chance to counter and I argued that although anyone can become producers now the quality of the content being made has declined so we are getting more content but it is no longer as good as it used to be. I also argued that many of the older generations do not use social media and therefore still rely on old media such as newspapers, radio, and television for information. Another argument that was made was most Twitter accounts are inactive, meaning that those account don’t post anything or follow any other accounts.

After both sides had made their arguments and counter arguments the Floor had the opportunity to ask questions to both sides about what had just been discussed.

After both sides had had a chance to answer the questions we took a vote and 14 people voted in favour of the statement with 2 people voting against it. The end result was we all agreed that digital media and user generated content has changed the production and consumption for the better as everything can be accessed digitally it makes accessing them easier for everyone.

Evaluation
This task was difficult for me and my group as there was not a lot of information available about what we had to argue but there was a lot that the side arguing for could say so it was easier for them in the debate. However if I had searched a bit more I could have found more useful information that I could have used to strengthen our argument.

Research sources
http://www.copypress.com/blog/the-pitfalls-of-user-generated-content/ – Date accessed 5th November 2015
http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/04/28/user-generated-content – Date accessed 5th November 2015
http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/04/28/user-generated-content – Date accessed 5th November 2015

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Digital Media and User Generated Content debate

  1. Where did you get your research from?
    You need to go into more depth about the debate and the overall experience of it. What happened?
    What was the end result?
    Evaluate.
    Please respond updated when complete.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s